Legal Services

Restraint Orders

Restraint orders under the proceeds of crime act 2002


Ashman Solicitors’ expertise include the provision of legal aid for fraud and financial crime cases involving restraint orders. Under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 the Prosecution is entitled to apply to a Court for an order that seeks to “restrain” the assets of an individual. The Prosecution can do this without giving notice to the individual concerned if there is a fear. A fear that assets may be dissipated or diminished in value. This procedure is known as an “ex parte” application and is often used by the Prosecution.

If successful, the Restraint Order will effectively “freeze” (or they may be a specific freezing order)assets of the individual either in part or in their entirety. In other situations an individual is put on notice that the Prosecution are seeking a Restraint Order. Furthermore that they can make representations to the court. Even in the case of a Restraint order granted ex parte an individual always has the opportunity to make representations to the Court for it to be varied or discharged.


The justification for restraint orders is that property which may later, following a conviction, be the subject of Confiscation is required to be protected and preserved. Confiscation proceedings follow a conviction of any individual who has been unjustly enriched by his criminal conduct. In this way if any individual has been convicted and has benefited from the crime. Then the Prosecution seek an order from the Court as to the amount he has benefited from his criminal conduct. Once the Court has made a determination of the criminal benefit, it has to decide what the individuals realisable assets are. The Restrained assets can then be utilised to satisfy the Confiscation Order. This can be for any amount up to the value of the criminal benefit.

When an order can be sought and made

Section 40 of POCA sets out the situations in which the Court can make a Restraint Order. The Prosecution can and regularly do, seek such an order even before an individual has been arrested or interviewed on suspicion of any criminal activity. What the Prosecution must show is that an ‘investigation’ has commenced. Then that there is a reasonable cause to believe that the alleged offender has benefited from his criminal conduct. The Court when considering this question is not applying the standard of proof used in criminal cases, of being “sure” or beyond reasonable doubt but a much lower standard of a balance of probabilities.

Furthermore the court is not required to apply the strict rules of admissibility that apply in criminal trials. That effectively means the Judge can take account of evidence that could not be used in a criminal trial. Conversely, however the effect of this is that any information obtained in the restraint proceedings either by an individual volunteering it or by some other method. This information  cannot be used in criminal proceedings. In theory at least a “Chinese Wall” exists between the team prosecuting the case and the team conducting the restraint proceedings.

Terms of an Order

The terms of a Restraint can be quite debilitating to an individuals business and on occasions can in fact cost him money (see below). Following an initial procedure which can involve an individual being ordered to provide information as to all his assets. The Order, if successfully obtained, will list the individuals property including, but not limited to, bank accounts ( business and personal), properties. Also included are businesses both in this jurisdiction and abroad. A failure to disclose property can lead to the prosecution applying to the Court to hold the individual in Contempt of Court for the failure. Care must be taken therefore when responding to a request or order for a list of assets.

A finding that an individual has deliberately withheld information about his assets or their extent can and sometimes does lead to a period of imprisonment for the contempt. In those situations it is always advisable that an individual “comes clean” when the failure to disclose is discovered. The provision of accurate information even at this stage will be treated favourably by the Court and could avoid a jail term. The Order will specify what can and cannot be done in respect of the identified property. Usually the Order is couched in terms which are designed to ensure that the value of the property in question is not diminished or dissipated. So for example there may be an order that property cannot be sold or withdrawals from bank accounts cannot be made.

Ring fencing of certain assets or Partial Restraint of assets

The purpose of a Restraint Order is to preserve assets which may later be set off against a confiscation order On occasions therefore, not all of an individual’s property is made the subject of a Restraint Order. This usually applies where he owns more assets of greater value than the prosecution allege he has criminally benefited. This “ring fencing” of assets is however fairly rare. However, it can be a useful tool for an individual to employ when he wants to continue operating a business without all the inconvenience a Restraint Order over all of his assets.

Living Expenses

As part of the Order an individual whose property and assets have been restrained will be allowed “reasonable” living expenses. The start point is usually a meagre £250 per week. However an individual can and should seek a variation of that by making representations to the Prosecution. Sometimes such representations are met with success but often an application needs to be made to the Court for a variation. Here it is hugely important to make only realistic demands. The Court will not entertain fanciful requests for increases in the allowance. What is required is a carefully set out analysis of all required expenses with justifications for the expenditure that is required. If you are unsure speak with our Fraud & Financial Crime Solicitors.

Legal Expenses Not Allowed

Restrained assets cannot be used to fund legal advice in relation to the criminal offences with which an individual the subject of the Restraint Order is charged. However that person obviously will receive Legal Aid for such representation.

Management Receivers

The reason why a Restraint Order may prove costly to the individual concerned is this. Under s.48 of the Act, if an individual’s finances are complex the Court may appoint a Management Receiver to receive and manage the property. Management Receiver duties are usually conducted by large well known and expensive accountancy firms. The Court can grant Receivers very wide-ranging powers to take possession. They also have control and management of some or all of the individual’s property and assets. In some cases Management Receivers take over the role of completely managing the individual’s affairs. In other cases they adopt a role which oversees the running of the business.

In either case the first port of call for their usually very significant fees is the individual or business that is the subject of the Restraint Order. The appointment of Management Receivers in any case could spell extreme financial difficulties. This could be ruinous given their charging rates and should always be examined carefully and timeously and where appropriate be challenged. Again the Act gives an individual the right to challenge the appointment of Management Receivers or the extent of their powers.

Why Choose Us?

Whether your legal problem is relating to fraud or criminal law. Ashmans Solicitors  can help and there are a number of reasons why you should choose us.

  • We have specialist Fraud Defence solicitors available 24 hours a day.  7 days a week so no matter when you need us, we can be there to give you the expert advice you need.
  • Once you have instructed us we will select an experienced barrister. This will be a Barrister  who is based nearby, and arrange a conference with them so you can be clear about your prospects
  • Ashmans Solicitors has built a reputation as a leading criminal fraud defence practice. Meaning that we can put all of our experience behind you and make sure that we get you the best possible outcome. Whatever the fraud charges you are facing
  • Because we have nationwide coverage, it doesn’t matter where you are in England or Wales.
  • By being meticulous and not leaving any stone unturned when preparing your case. Therefore we are more likely to have find anything which may mitigate your charges and help your case
  • If you are facing Proceeds Of Crime Act (POCA) proceedings following a conviction for fraud. Contact us immediately before you speak with the police or prosecution. We will be able to help you to reduce the impact on you and your family using our skilled team to prepare for the hearing.

Contact us Now

You can get in touch with us in a number of different ways. You can call us on 0333 009 6275, available 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

If you would prefer you can email us on or complete our Free Online Enquiry Form and we’ll be delighted to help you.

How can we help?

Contact us for a free, initial no obligation consultation.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Your information is safe and treated in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Why choose us?

  • We have successfully recovered over £30 million in compensation for our clients.
  • Our offices are situated throughout the UK in 6 key locations.
  • We have multi-lingual staff who can immediately assist you.
  • We only use plain and simple language, with no complex, legal jargon.
  • We offer you a free, initial consultation.
  • You can be assured of competitive prices and a very high success rate.
  • We are the first choice for professionals who need help with keeping their driving licence.
  • Once you have instructed us, we will select an experienced barrister, who is local to you. We’ll arrange a conference with them so you can be clear about your prospects.
  • We pride ourselves on finding often-missed opportunities that will mitigate your charges and help your case.
  • We are ranked as a leading firm in the 2017 edition of the Legal 500 – one of the foremost guides to law firms in the United Kingdom.
  • If you are facing Proceeds Of Crime Act (POCA) proceedings following a conviction for fraud, we will be able to help you reduce the impact that this will have on you and your family.
  • Our reputation as a leading defence firm in general and serious crime cases is built on the strength we have in creating viable defences.
  • We will attend the police station to offer you independent legal advice free of charge, as you will need to be clear about where you stand from the outset.
  • We help to mitigate Restraining Orders, lessening the effect on you, your family and your business.
About Us

Notable cases

Your Justice is Our Mission.

R-v-LF Leeds Crown Court

The defendant in this case was a qualified Certified Accountant. She was originally arrested and interviewed for conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud totalling sums going into millions of pounds.

Read more about "R-v-LF Leeds Crown Court"

Operation Janitor

Operation Janitor was a large-scale VAT fraud investigated and prosecuted by SOCA. The fraud involved nearly 20 companies and abuse of the zero-rated vat reclaims system for new build properties.

Read more about "Operation Janitor"

R-v-TA Leeds Crown Court

In this case the defendant along with four others was charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice arising out of an accident in which a person died following a road traffic collision.

Read more about "R-v-TA Leeds Crown Court"

R-v-AA & Others Hull Court

The prosecution allege that our client along with a number of other defendants has been involved in a conspiracy to transfer criminal property being valued in tens of thousands of pounds.

Read more about "R-v-AA & Others Hull Court"

R-v-NF Bradford Crown Court

A number of defendant’s in this case were charged with conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud and money laundering in of an overall sum approaching £1m.

Read more about "R-v-NF Bradford Crown Court"

"Operation Caring Today" Preston Crown Court

Ashman’s Solicitors successfully secures acquittal in a high profile fraud and money laundering case.

Read more about ""Operation Caring Today" Preston Crown Court"

R-v-MD & Others Old Bailey

The defendant along with a number of others was alleged to have murdered the deceased arising as a result of a revenge attack.

Read more about "R-v-MD & Others Old Bailey"

R-v-AA & Others Huntingdon Crown Court

The Defendant, along with 4 others, was charged with entering into an arrangement to launder the proceeds of crime totalling in excess of £1 million.

Read more about "R-v-AA & Others Huntingdon Crown Court"

R-v-AN Bradford Crown Court

The Defendant, a Company Director, was charged with fraud by false representation amounting to over £660,000.

Read more about "R-v-AN Bradford Crown Court"

R-v-CV Leeds Crown Court

The Defendant was charged with fraud by false representation in relation to his role with two companies plus a further charge of theft relating to an alleged loss to David Brown Ltd said to be over £113,000.

Read more about "R-v-CV Leeds Crown Court"

R-v-SA Snaresbrook Crown Court

This was a highly publicised case involving the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. The Defendant was charged with fraud by false representation.

Read more about "R-v-SA Snaresbrook Crown Court"

R-v-TC & Others Operation Aquamarine Southwark Crown Court

The Defendant was charged with conspiracy to defraud Barclays Private Client International Bank by obtaining mortgage loans to which the Crown allege they were not entitled to.

Read more about "R-v-TC & Others Operation Aquamarine Southwark Crown Court"


Don't take our word for it

Ashmans Solicitors were completely professional in their approach from start to finish. They kept me informed of my case throughout and I was overjoyed with the outcome and service.

Jill Buckley
Read testimonials