Introduction
Some drivers assume that taking penalty points for someone else is a minor favour. In reality, providing false information about who was driving can amount to the serious criminal offence of perverting the course of justice.
The courts treat this offence seriously because it involves misleading the authorities and interfering with the justice process.
Even where the original motoring offence is relatively minor, such as speeding, a false driver nomination can lead to criminal prosecution and a real risk of custody.
What Is Perverting the Course of Justice?
Perverting the course of justice is a common law criminal offence in England and Wales.
The offence occurs when a person
- Does an act or engages in a course of conduct
- That has a tendency to interfere with the administration of justice
- And intends to do so.
The offence is extremely broad and covers a wide range of conduct, including:
- Destroying or concealing evidence
- Making false allegations
- Interfering with witnesses
- Providing false information during a criminal investigation
- Assisting someone to evade arrest
Because the offence strikes at the integrity of the justice system, the courts treat it with particular seriousness. The maximum sentence is life imprisonment, although such sentences are rare and reserved for the most serious cases.
Why Taking Penalty Points for Someone Else Is Illegal
When a speeding or traffic offence is detected by camera, the registered keeper will usually receive a notice requiring them to identify the driver.
Providing false information in response to that request is where serious criminal liability may arise.
Common examples include:
- A friend claiming to have been the driver when they were not
- A family member accepting penalty points to protect another driver
- Giving false driver details to avoid a driving ban
These actions may be treated as deliberate attempts to mislead the authorities.
Even if the original offence was minor, the deception itself can be far more serious than the motoring allegation.

Common Examples of Perverting the Course of Justice in Driving Cases
Many cases arise from attempts to avoid the consequences of road traffic offences.
Typical scenarios include:
False Driver Nominations
A person may falsely claim they were driving when a speeding offence or other road traffic offence occurred.
Accepting Penalty Points for Another Driver
Someone may accept penalty points on behalf of another motorist to help them avoid a ban, higher insurance costs, or prosecution.
Providing False Statements
A person may give misleading information to police during a motoring investigation.
Concealing Evidence
A person may destroy documents, hide evidence, or obstruct an investigation to prevent the true driver being identified.
These situations can lead to serious criminal allegations beyond the original motoring offence.
What Is the Sentence for Perverting the Course of Justice?
Perverting the course of justice carries serious penalties.
The offence is triable only in the Crown Court, reflecting its seriousness.
Sentencing Guidelines
The courts consider several factors when deciding sentence, including:
- The seriousness of the underlying offence
- The level of planning involved
- Whether an innocent person was implicated
- The impact on the investigation
The Sentencing Council guideline provides a range from community order to custody, depending on culpability and harm.
Typical Sentences in Motoring Cases
In cases involving false driver nominations, custody is a real risk.
In many cases involving false driver nominations:
- Sentences of several months’ imprisonment are common
- Suspended sentences may be imposed in less serious cases
- Community orders may be considered in limited circumstances
Each case turns on its own facts, and sentence will depend on the evidence, any guilty plea, mitigation and the seriousness of the conduct.
How Police Investigate Penalty Point Fraud
Investigations may begin when inconsistencies appear in driver nomination forms or accounts given to police.
Modern investigations may involve:
- ANPR and CCTV evidence
- Mobile phone location data
- Social media activity
- Witness statements
- Forensic document analysis
Police may compare accounts, vehicle movements and other evidence to establish who was actually driving at the time.
Because these cases often involve allegations of deliberate dishonesty, early legal advice is important if you are contacted by police or asked to attend an interview.
Facing Legal Issue?
Speak to our Criminal Defence team for confidential advice on your position and next steps.
Strictly Confidential and No Obligation

Possible Defences to Allegations
Every case depends on its facts and evidence.
Potential defence arguments may include:
Lack of Intent
The prosecution must prove that the accused intended to pervert the course of justice.
Mistaken Identity
A person may have genuinely believed that another person was driving. The issue will depend on the evidence and the steps taken to check.
Insufficient Evidence
The prosecution must prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. Any gaps or inconsistencies in the evidence may be important.
Procedural Issues
Errors in the investigation or prosecution process may affect how the case is approached.
A detailed review of the evidence is essential before deciding how to respond.
How a Criminal Defence Solicitor Can Help
Allegations of perverting the course of justice are extremely serious and require specialist legal representation.
An experienced criminal defence solicitor can:
- Analyse the evidence against you
- Identify weaknesses in the prosecution case
- Advise on plea strategy
- Represent you in the Crown Court
- Present mitigation to reduce the risk of custody where appropriate
Early legal advice is particularly important if you are under investigation, have been contacted by police, or believe false information may have been provided.
5 Key Takeaways
- Taking penalty points for another driver may amount to perverting the course of justice.
- The offence involves conduct intended to mislead or interfere with the justice process.
- These cases often arise from false driver nominations after speeding or other road traffic offences.
- Perverting the course of justice is dealt with in the Crown Court.
- Custody is a real risk, even where the original driving offence was relatively minor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Accepting penalty points on behalf of another driver can amount to perverting the course of justice, which frequently results in custodial sentences.
Yes. Providing false information about the identity of a driver may constitute perverting the course of justice or a related criminal offence.
If false driver information is discovered, those involved may be investigated and prosecuted. The case may be dealt with in the Crown Court.
The maximum sentence is life imprisonment, although that is reserved for the most serious cases.
No. Sentencing depends on the circumstances, including the level of planning, the seriousness of the underlying offence and the impact on the investigation.
Often, yes. Courts usually treat deception aimed at misleading the justice process as more serious than the original motoring offence.
Call us on 0333 009 6275. We are available to take your call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
You can also email us on enquiries@ashmanssolicitors.com or complete our Online Enquiry Form and we’ll be in touch soon.
Get in touch
We’ll respond within 15 minutes during office hours
Search our legal articles
Free expert guidance on criminal law, your rights, and what to expect at every stage.
Searching Legal Help Hub articles
Related insights and updates



